Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Journal #2: On the Waterfront

Working on the docks and shipyards can be a tough job but if the union bosses are corrupt, it's hell. A great American film with that very plot was On the Waterfront. It starred a young Marlon Brando whose film career and fame was rapidly skyrocketing from instant classics. Brando is Terry Milloy, an ex-boxer that is caught up with the bad union bosses because of his brother and his rough past. In the beginning, he's a tough guy that seems to have no direction, a dirty mouth, and (almost) no concern for others. All that changes when he meets the girl of his dreams, Edie Doyle (Eva Marie Saint). With the help of the neighborhood priest, Father Barry (Karl Malden), Milloy tries to stand up against his former comrades and risks his life. Nobody in the shipyard wants to be considered a "rat" because their lives depend on keeping their mouths shut. Fear is best tool for these corrupt union bosses to go unnoticed.


The screenplay, by Budd Schulberg, allows for us to see the good side of Terry Milloy even before he realizes it himself. It tells the viewers that he is a decent person. John Friendly (Lee J. Comb), the mob-like union leader, seems to be worried about Milloy's commitment to his devilish ways. When he's in the room, Friendly treats him like a great buddy and shows him all the attention. Another man makes sure to tell Milloy he has a friend with them, almost to avoid his potential fallout. This is a key scene that disassociates him from them even though he had been around them for a long time. Another softening of his hard shell is when he is disappointed to learn that he was complicit in a murder because he thought they were going to beat up the dock-worker.

Many of the scenes start with a set-up shot or an extreme long shot which gives the film good balance, in my opinion. It is especially useful in the shipyard scenes and the roof-top scenes. Most of the shots, understandably, would from medium range which showed Brando or others from the waist up. Lighting almost all high-key; instead of shadows there is plenty fog and cigar smoke that dulls the frames and shows a darker side. That's the feeling I got from it.

I thought one of the great aspects of the film is its sound. According the credits, the people I should be thanking are James Shields and Leonard Bernstein. For a film made in the mid 1950s it had intelligent sound of ships and good timing on the mellow orchestra. The dialog seemed to good, other than a few phrases I had never heard before. For example, they don't use the word saloon much anymore. The one phrase that is still heard frequently today and the calling card for Marlon Brando is...

"...I coulda' been a contenda"

Another aspect that I found interesting was the wardrobe (Anna Hill Johnstone). The little roof-top-boys that hang around Terry Milloy have matching Golden Warriors jackets. Today, they're known as the Marquette Golden Eagles and it was just an interesting parallel to see. Terry and the rest of the dock workers had predictable attire and I felt the simplicity worked well with the nature of the film. It Brando's attire resembled Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. I see many similarities between these two films and the actors themselves. Both Nicholson and Brando seem to carry their films all the way to classic stardom.

This film has all of the makings of classic and has stood the test of time. Marlon Brando is considered one of the greatest actors of all time because of his ability to become "one" with the character and his undeniable charm. On the Waterfront will be enjoyed by many more generations to come, there's no doubt about that.

Monday, February 11, 2008

Journal #1: Lake of Fire

One of the most controversial issues in America today is abortion. It can cause such intense emotions because of it's connections to faith, poverty, race, equality, and sex. A moving documentary that deals with this very issue and which I'm interested in seeing is "Lake of Fire" directed and produced by Tony Kaye (American History X). Apparently, Kaye had worked on this film for 15 years and shot in black and white. Critics have enjoyed Kaye's neutrality in the film, keeping both perspectives open and honest but have emphasized it's "digusting" and "wrenching" approach. I hope to learn more about these frightening religious-fundamentalist terrorists who will do almost anything for this cause. This graphic film even has a scene of an actual abortion in all of it's nastiness.

One of the most famous movie critics of all time, Roger Ebert (full review) weighs in on the film,
"At 152 minutes, his film doesn't seem long, because at every moment something absorbing, disturbing, depressing or infuriating is happening."
It doesn't surprise me at all that there are "disturbing" or "depressing" things happening because abortion encompasses all of those feelings. A movie that has been in the making for 15 years, one would hope, would be engaging to an audience because of the sheer time length. If I worked on anything for 15 years it would, no doubt, be a masterpiece. But lets move on to more critic opinions.

To be completley honest, this next critic review almost makes me not want to see it. I can stomach some gruesome images but from the sounds of this review, I might not make it without losing lunch. Thankfully, this reviewer says that the documentary benefits from the black and white nature because, much like Schindler's List, the viewer won't be as affected to the ample amount of blood. NY Times: Manohla Dargis (full review),
"The film doesn’t employ narration or on-screen texts that reveal his views on abortion; instead, there are 152 minutes of talking-head testimonials, on-the-street interviews and archival and new visuals...the decision to use black and white was smart because, as with too much "Schindler's List," red might well have sent audiences fleeing from theaters. The absence of color blunts the force of the images, which allows you to watch the movie rather than avert your gaze and your rattled mind."
Documentaries, in my opinion, are almost always watchable because their is a connection present. Kaye is not seen as a documentary maker because of his previous work on "American History X" (that was a great film in my opinion). Many people don't know what the process of getting an abortion is, they just assume that it's a magical process that is over and no disgusting crap involved. It will be hard to justify abortion after seeing some of the images presented in the film. I would hope their would be a discussion about the affects of Roe v. Wade on crime and poverty. Most of all, it is a message that people need to see the consequences of their potential actions, like having unprotected sex. Dargis shows why people are willing to go at such lengths to stop abortion,
"It’s possible that Mr. Kaye opted to show several abortions because he wanted viewers, particularly those sympathetic to a woman’s right to abortion, to understand what stirs some people not just to action, but also to kill doctors."
I'll admit, I'm fearful of the images that I will see if I watch "Lake of Fire". Will it be worth it? One thing is clear, the issue of abortion and it's legality will never go away. I'm interested in seeing this film because I know that I will gain an understanding of the issue that I don't have now. This documentary, in my opinion, will not be the most enjoyable 152 minutes but it will, hopefully, help me gain knowledge on a complex subject. I read a book called "Freakonomics" and learned about the great Economist, Steven Levitt and his claim about Roe v. Wade causing the decline in crime. That's an economist view, now I want a moral view. I want to stop writing about abortion...now.

I'm Pro-Choice.

Tuesday, February 5, 2008



I saw the movie "Inland Empire" directed by David Lynch and staring Laura Dern. During the movie, I kept wondering whether I was dreaming because the images that I was seeing had no apparent connection to one another. The film had no compact storyline, but if I were to sum it up I would say it was a horror movie that toys with the viewers unconscious mind. Laura Dern's husband in the film warns her that if she cheats on him she will face terrible consequences. I really enjoyed the movie because for the first time in a while, I had no idea what would happen next. Although it was confusing at times, it made up for it with constant suspense and intensity. Inland Empire is interwoven with the making of the movie, and the actual movie itself. David Lynch, nominated for four oscars for previous works, is a great director in my opinion because he breaks all conventions and doesn't feel like he has to create a film that will gain attention. Instead, he is content with making masterpieces that many people will never see. I want to watch another one of his films soon, most likely Mulholland Drive. The End.

Movies I want to see...


  • Rambo

  • Micheal Clayton

  • Cloverfield

  • The Bucket List

  • There Will Be Blood

  • Eastern Promises

  • Lake of Fire

  • The Assassination of Jesse James